Legal basis and room for manoeuvre
The obligation to have a HACCP-based procedure is set out in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs. The general hygiene requirements for premises, equipment, staff, water and waste are in its Annex II. The amendment by Regulation (EU) 2021/382 added two topics there: allergen management, for example for equipment, transport and storage, and food safety culture as a chapter of its own. In Germany, the Food Hygiene Ordinance (LMHV) and the Food and Feed Code (LFGB) supplement the EU requirements.
The regulation does not demand an off-the-shelf plan. Scope and form depend on the type and size of the business. The European Commission has explained in a notice how this flexibility is to be understood: small businesses with simple processes can rely largely on good hygiene practice, use sector guides and keep documentation brief. Anyone who heats, cools, fills or produces for vulnerable groups needs a more detailed analysis.
Technically, authorities and businesses follow the General Principles of Food Hygiene of the Codex Alimentarius, revised in 2020. They distinguish more clearly between good hygiene practice as the basis and the HACCP principles for the points that need special attention. For many sectors there are also national guides to good hygiene practice that can serve as a starting point. Sightadel does not replace these guides, but takes you through the points in a structured way and records decisions and evidence.
Costs and internal effort
The Sightadel licence for HACCP is charged monthly per edition, with discounts for multiple frameworks and advance payment. You can find all prices and a calculator on our pricing page. You can try it free for 14 days without payment details.
The real effort lies in the business. Drawing up a plan needs people who really know the processes: production or kitchen, quality, purchasing, engineering. In a small business, that is often two or three people over a few weeks, with the focus on the flow diagram and hazard analysis. After that, there is ongoing effort for measurements, records, cleaning evidence, training and the annual verification.
External costs may arise for laboratory analyses, pest control, maintenance of measuring equipment and, where applicable, an audit to a retail standard. These are invoiced by the respective providers themselves. If a hazard analysis gets tricky, for example with new products or processes, you can book expert consulting as a package in the app.
Official food controls: what is checked and what is at stake
Food control authorities at district and city level carry out risk-based inspections. How often a business is visited depends on the type of food, the processes and the results of previous inspections. Inspections are usually unannounced. Premises, hygiene, temperatures and processes are checked on site, and documents are requested: hazard analysis, critical control points with critical limits, monitoring records, corrective actions, cleaning and pest control records, training records and statutory hygiene instructions.
Missing or incomplete own checks can lead to orders, follow-up inspections, fines and, in serious cases, closure. Under the Food and Feed Code (LFGB), the authorities can also publish certain breaches. If unsafe food is placed on the market, withdrawal or recall and criminal law questions come into play.
Conversely, a properly maintained plan is your best evidence of due diligence. If you can show that critical limits were monitored, deviations detected and corrections made, you are in a much better position after an incident. The legal assessment of an individual case is a matter for your legal adviser; Sightadel does not provide legal advice.
In practice, it helps to keep the documents ready so that they can be found during an unannounced inspection even without the person responsible. In Sightadel, the current status is compiled in a few clicks, also for the deputy.
Building the hazard analysis properly
The hazard analysis is the heart of the plan and at the same time its most common weak point. It starts with a complete flow diagram from goods receipt to dispatch, including rework, intermediate storage and cleaning steps. The diagram is checked on site, because the shortcuts that are taken in everyday work are often exactly what is missing on paper.
For each step, possible hazards are recorded: biological ones such as microbial growth or survival of pathogens, chemical ones such as cleaning agent residues, physical ones such as glass, metal or plastic, and allergens through cross-contact. Each hazard is assessed by likelihood and severity. Only from this does it follow which hazards must be controlled at this step.
Then comes the decision as to whether a step is a critical control point or whether the hazard is sufficiently controlled by the prerequisite programmes. Many businesses use a decision tree for this. What matters is that the justification is recorded, even if the answer is “not a CCP”. This is exactly what inspectors and auditors ask about.
In Sightadel, the analysis is guided step by step. The template suggests typical hazards in your industry; you make the assessment and decision. Every justification remains traceable with date and editor.
Food safety culture and allergen management
Since the 2021 amendment, the management of a food business must establish, maintain and be able to demonstrate an appropriate food safety culture. This means that safety is not just written in documents but takes priority in everyday work. It includes clear responsibilities, sufficient resources, regular training, open communication about problems and a management that leads by example. Scope and form depend on the type and size of the business.
Culture cannot be evidenced with a single document. Proven approaches include training records, minutes of team meetings, a procedure through which staff can report problems without repercussions, analysed deviations, and objectives that management sets and reviews. Some businesses also carry out short surveys.
Allergen management is about cross-contact in storage, production and transport, and about correct labelling. Typical measures are separate storage locations, cleaning steps between products, production sequences and label checks when recipes change. In Sightadel, allergens are asked about separately in the hazard analysis, and training runs as recurring cycles with evidence.
Verification and ongoing evidence
A HACCP plan is only as good as its last review. The regulation requires it to be reviewed and adapted whenever there is a change to the product, process or any production step. New recipes, a new supplier, a new piece of equipment or changed opening hours can be enough. Regardless of this, an annual verification is advisable.
Verification includes reviewing monitoring records, analysing deviations and complaints, laboratory testing of products or surfaces, calibrating measuring equipment and internal walk-throughs. The result is documented, and changes are incorporated into the plan.
In everyday operations, many businesses fail less because of the plan than because of the records. Logs are kept with gaps, thermometers are not checked, training is forgotten. In Sightadel, monitoring, cleaning, calibration, training and verification are set up as cycles with an owner and a due date. If a piece of evidence expires, it appears on the dashboard before the inspector asks for it. Sightadel is not a measuring system; you file your records from sensors or logs as evidence.
If you are also audited to IFS, BRCGS or FSSC 22000, you use the same evidence. External auditors get their own access in Sightadel, see plan, decisions and records in one place and can comment, but never delete.